Multithreading in Python: Choosing the Right Model

Mar 17, 2024 ยท 4 min read

Multithreading can significantly improve the performance and responsiveness of Python applications. However, choosing the right multithreading model in Python requires careful consideration of your use case and tradeoffs between different approaches. This article provides a practical overview of the main options for multithreading in Python and guidelines for selecting the best approach.

Common Use Cases for Multithreading

Some typical situations where multithreading can help in Python include:

  • Performing time-consuming I/O operations in the background while keeping the main thread responsive
  • Processing independent tasks concurrently to utilize multiple CPU cores
  • Serving multiple clients concurrently in a server application
  • Ensuring a responsive graphical user interface when performing long-running tasks
  • Overview of Main Multithreading Models

    Python provides several modules and techniques for working with threads, each with their own strengths and limitations:

    1. Threading Module and Thread Objects

    The threading module in the Python standard library provides a simple way to create and manage threads. You can subclass Thread and override the run() method to define the work that gets done in each thread:

    import threading
    class MyThread(threading.Thread):
        def run(self):
            # thread work here
    thread = MyThread()  


  • Simple API for creating and managing threads
  • Integrated with lock primitives for synchronization
  • Cons:

  • Limited options for sharing data between threads
  • Cannot utilize multiple CPU cores
  • 2. Multiprocessing Module and Process Objects

    The multiprocessing module creates process-based parallelism instead of threads. It sidesteps the Global Interpreter Lock by using subprocesses instead of threads:

    import multiprocessing
    def worker():
        # process work here
    process = multiprocessing.Process(target=worker)


  • Better CPU utilization and parallelism
  • Separate memory space for each process
  • Cons:

  • Higher overhead from creating processes
  • More complex data sharing between processes
  • 3. Asynchronous Programming with asyncio

    The asyncio module provides an event loop and task-based asynchronous programming model. It uses cooperative multitasking and enables high concurrency even in a single-threaded application:

    import asyncio
    async def main():
        await some_io_operation() 
        # other async tasks here


  • Excellent performance for I/O-bound workloads
  • Simpler than explicit thread/process management
  • Cons:

  • Asynchronous code can be more complex
  • Limited options for CPU-bound parallelism
  • Key Considerations for Model Selection

    With an understanding of the main options available, here are some key criteria to consider when selecting a multithreading approach:

    1. I/O-Bound vs. CPU-Bound Work - asyncio shines for I/O-intensive workloads while multiprocessing is better for CPU-intensive parallelism.

    2. Simplicity vs. Control - The threading module provides less complexity while asyncio and multiprocessing give more flexibility and customization.

    3. Data Sharing Needs - Sharing data with multiprocessing requires more explicit data copying or shared memory. threading and asyncio have simpler in-memory sharing.

    4. Pickling Limitations - multiprocessing may not work for data types that cannot be pickled and transferred between processes.

    5. Code Architecture - asyncio enables concurrency in a single thread but requires non-blocking async programming. The other models allow conventional blocking code.

    There are also hybrid approaches possible, such as using multiprocessing and asyncio together to get the best of both models.

    Example Scenarios

    To make model selection more concrete, here are two example scenarios with recommendations:

    Web Scraping - A CPU-bound workload that processes multiple pages in parallel. multiprocessing works well here to utilize all CPU cores for maximum throughput.

    Web Server - Serving concurrent requests with both I/O and CPU-bound operations. An event loop running asyncio tasks combined with multiprocessing processes works great for these workloads.

    The above guidelines and examples should equip you to make an informed choice. Always prototype and benchmark with different models when possible!

    Key Takeaways

  • Python provides threading, multiprocessing, and asyncio as main options for multithreading.
  • Understand your workload, data sharing needs and code architecture when selecting a model.
  • For I/O-bound work prioritize asyncio, for CPU-bound parallelism use multiprocessing.
  • Hybrid approaches combining modules are often optimal for many real-world workloads.
  • Prototype and benchmark with different models!
  • Multithreading effectively in Python requires understanding the strengths and limitations of key modules like threading, multiprocessing and asyncio. By accurately characterizing your workload and needs you can utilize the right approach and reap significant performance and responsiveness gains in your applications.

    Browse by tags:

    Browse by language:

    The easiest way to do Web Scraping

    Get HTML from any page with a simple API call. We handle proxy rotation, browser identities, automatic retries, CAPTCHAs, JavaScript rendering, etc automatically for you

    Try ProxiesAPI for free

    curl ""

    <!doctype html>
        <title>Example Domain</title>
        <meta charset="utf-8" />
        <meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
        <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />


    Don't leave just yet!

    Enter your email below to claim your free API key: